Realty Mart Corporation v. Standring

(dissenting) — It is a specious argument and a distinction without a difference to say that the contract in suit is less definite and certain than that set out in Ewing v. Shepard, 143 Wash. 679, 256 Pac. 71, 259 Pac. 881; or that the commission was not specifically agreed upon as in that case, when it was a mere matter of computation of the percentages according to the schedule of the Seattle Real Estate Board, or “Realty Board,” as named the second time, doubtless for brevity.

Under our decisions in that case, the Muir case, Henneberg v. Cook, 103 Wash. 685, 175 Pac. 313; Grant v. Ten Hope,…