Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Prue

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 8, 2010No. 21, Sept. Term, 2009Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHarrell, J.

Although I have no huge quarrel with the opportunity presented by the judgment reached by the Majority Opinion allowing the Court of Special Appeals the opportunity to engage in an analysis of whether lesser included offenses existed here, I submit that the record is adequate to conclude that the Circuit Court for Charles County actually convicted Prue under Counts 3 through 8. The Majority Opinion opines that further proceedings in the Court of Special Appeals are required in order to determine whether any or all of the offenses charged in Counts 3 through 8 constitute lesser included…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Christian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Barber v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API