Legal Opinion
Roberts & Schaefer Co. v. Hardaway Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided August 31, 1998No. 97-2664PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
• MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
This diversity ease arises out of three contracts between Roberts & Schaefer Company (“R & S”), a general contractor, and The Hardaway Company (“Hardaway”), a subcontractor, concerning construction of a phosphate beneficiation plant for Mobil Mining & Minerals Co. (“Mobil”). Following a jury trial before the magistrate judge, the court entered judgment for Hardaway on two of the contracts, and judgment for R & S on the third. On appeal, Hardaway contends that the magistrate judge erred in permitting R & S to take advantage of the unilateral mistake doctrine with…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hyman v. CohenSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Maryland Casualty Company v. KrasnekSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Marriott Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Dasta Construction Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Harold T. McCormick v. R. B. Kent, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Goldsmith v. Bagby Elevator Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Robert Adams v. Austal, USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Janet Bogle, Sherri Bowers v. William McClure, Mary Jamerson WardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Bearint Ex Rel. Bearint v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.