Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Bernard

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 9, 2007No. 57296-2-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 This is an appeal from the first half of a bifurcated dissolution trial. Husband Tom Bernard appeals the trial court’s verdict that the prenuptial agreement and subsequent amendment are unenforceable.

Baker, J. —

I

¶2 Tom Bernard hired Gloria Whitehead in 1994. Gloria worked for Tom’s real estate development and management firm. In April 1999, they were engaged to be married. Both *830had been married before, and both had adult children. The parties had an imbalance of assets: Tom’s net worth at the time was approximately $25,000,000, Gloria’s was $38,000.

¶3 When he proposed, Tom mentioned a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. DennisonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. BarberioWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Stringfellow v. StringfellowWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Pinkis v. Network Cinema Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. In Re the Marriage of MatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In re the Marriage of BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Kellar v. Estate of KellarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Neuson v. Macy's Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Neuson v. MACY'S DEPT. STORES INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API