In re the Marriage of Bernard
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 This is an appeal from the first half of a bifurcated dissolution trial. Husband Tom Bernard appeals the trial court’s verdict that the prenuptial agreement and subsequent amendment are unenforceable.
Baker, J. —
I
¶2 Tom Bernard hired Gloria Whitehead in 1994. Gloria worked for Tom’s real estate development and management firm. In April 1999, they were engaged to be married. Both *830had been married before, and both had adult children. The parties had an imbalance of assets: Tom’s net worth at the time was approximately $25,000,000, Gloria’s was $38,000.
¶3 When he proposed, Tom mentioned a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. DennisonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BarberioWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Stringfellow v. StringfellowWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Pinkis v. Network Cinema Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- In Re the Marriage of MatsonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Marriage of BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- In re the Marriage of BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Kellar v. Estate of KellarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Neuson v. Macy's Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Neuson v. MACY'S DEPT. STORES INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011