Legal Opinion

Neuson v. Macy's Department Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 22, 2011No. 28968-1-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

fl A trial court entered findings and concluded that an employer was entitled to a presumption that it mailed an election form, which permitted an employee to opt out of mandatory arbitration of employment-related disputes. The employee’s discrimination suit was stayed following the trial court’s order. We conclude that the court was not privileged to weigh the evidence in this summary proceeding. And we are unable to conclude that the employer is entitled to arbitration as a matter of law *789when we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the employee. We therefore reverse the trial…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mockowik v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  5. Renz v. Spokane Eye ClinicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott Woodward v. Emeritus CorporationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Pagecom, Inc. v. Sprint Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. Robbins v. Comcast Cable Communications Management LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API