Evans v. Daughtry
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Bullock Probate Court. Heard before Hon. S. F. Frazer.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
There is no conflict in the testimony in this case. It fully proves that Evans signed the bond conditionally, and left it with Eaney, his principal, with the understanding and instruction, that he was not to become a surety on the bond, unless Pearson and Scott became co-sureties with him. In other words, it was left with him as an escrow. ‘ Neither Pearson nor Scott signed the bond, and it results, if there is nothing else in the transaction, that Evans is not bound as a surety on the bond. — Bibb v. Reid, 3 Ala. 88; Guild v. Thomas, 54 Ala. 414; Marks v. First National Bank, 79 Ala. 550;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burns v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Bibb v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Herring, Farrell & Sherman v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Guild v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Wright v. LangSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Birmingham News Co. v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Sharp v. AllgoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Van Heuvel v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Campbell v. LarmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- McConnon & Co. v. KirbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924