Legal Opinion

McConnon & Co. v. Kirby

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 12, 1924No. 8 Div. 622PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is upon a guaranty bond given by defendants to secure a-present indebtedness and establish a line 'of credit for one J. H. Ott. Ott is not one of the obligors or makers of the bond, but the party to whom the consideration moved. For the purposes before us, the relation between him and defendants was that of principal and surety. The questions here presented relate to the sufficiency of special pleas 3, 4, and 5, as against the grounds of demurrer assigned thereto.

Plea No. 3 is a general plea of non est factum, except it avers, in the alternative, that no one else was authorized to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bibb v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  2. Firemen's Insurance v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  3. Guild v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  4. Marks v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. White Sewing Machine Co. v. SaxonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Birmingham News Co. v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Pasquale Food Co., Inc. v. L & H INTERNATIONAL AIR., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  4. Burgin v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Dillard v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API