Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tarsnane

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1952No. Appeal, 205PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The defendant was convicted of sodomy on Bill No. 403, and of related offenses charged in two other indictments. He was sentenced on the sodomy conviction alone. In this appeal it is contended that defendant, is entitled to a new trial because venue as laid in the indictment was contested and was not supported by the proofs.

The victim in this case was a seven-year old girl. Under the testimony, accepted by the jury, the defend^ ant enticed the child into his automobile on Wyoming Avenue in Philadelphia early in the afternoon of July-16, 1950. He then drove some distance to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BubnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Commonwealth v. MullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Commonwealth v. KaiserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Commonwealth v. WojdakowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Com. v. StefanowiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Chatary v. NailonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. FrankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. PrepSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Commonwealth v. SimeoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API