Commonwealth v. Tarsnane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
The defendant was convicted of sodomy on Bill No. 403, and of related offenses charged in two other indictments. He was sentenced on the sodomy conviction alone. In this appeal it is contended that defendant, is entitled to a new trial because venue as laid in the indictment was contested and was not supported by the proofs.
The victim in this case was a seven-year old girl. Under the testimony, accepted by the jury, the defend^ ant enticed the child into his automobile on Wyoming Avenue in Philadelphia early in the afternoon of July-16, 1950. He then drove some distance to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BubnisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Commonwealth v. MullSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Commonwealth v. KaiserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Commonwealth v. WojdakowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Com. v. StefanowiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Chatary v. NailonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Commonwealth v. FrankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. PrepSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Commonwealth v. SimeoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.