Legal Opinion

State v. Schlueter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

Defendant’s first contention is that the evidence does not sustain a finding that the neglect and refusal to provide for the support and maintenance of defendant’s child was wilful. The term “wilfully” as used in the statute and as used in the information filed herein means an intent on the part of the defendant to evade his parental duty to support and maintain his minor child. Zitlow v. State, 213 Wis. 493, 252 N. W. 358. The determination of this issue will require some statement of the facts.

The defendant and his wife were married June 5, 1943. The issue of the marriage was one son, who…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brozosky v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Zitlow v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huggett v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. CissellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Huggett v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. CissellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API