Armstrong v. Ford
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was" delivered by
Dunbar, C. J.
This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Thurston County, made on the 2d day of April, 1894, releasing and discharging to respondents certain goods from the custody of the receiver appointed by the court in the action then pending. The undisputed facts are about as follows: On the 19th day of March, 1892, the respondents, who were retail merchants in the city of Olympia, were indebted to Murphy, Grant & Co., wholesale dealers in dry goods, in the sum of $10,152, and for the pur*65pose of securing said indebtedness they made,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- People ex rel. Farrington v. BristolMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Hamilton v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
- Rose v. BevanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
- Allen v. GoodnowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Madson v. RuttenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Albien v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Everett v. Webb Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
- McCormack v. E. E. McCormack Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Robinson v. BoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.