Legal Opinion

Malfatti v. Bank of America, N.A.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 29, 2012No. 1101112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, Justice.

The United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (“the BAP”) has certified to this Court, pursuant to Rule 18, Ala. R.App. P., the following question: “In Alabama, is a ‘default’ judgment premised upon discovery sanctions or other post-answer conduct of the defendant sufficient to support the application of issue preclusion in a later proceeding?”1 We answer this question in the negative.

Facts and Procedural History

In its certification to this Court, the BAP provided the following factual background:

“[Anthony A.] Malfatti[, the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Bankr. L. Rep. P 68,272 Gail Spilman v. Darryl M. HarleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  4. Gober v. Terra + CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re Norman Docteroff, Debtor, Bert L. Wolstein Lady Iris Corporation v. Norman DocteroffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ronald Sellers v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  2. Rudy v. Walter Coke, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
  3. New Falls Corporation v. SoniDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
  4. Payne v. BallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2024
  5. The Estates of Robert Moss and Brenda Moss by Dana v. DorandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API