Malfatti v. Bank of America, N.A.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, Justice.
The United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (“the BAP”) has certified to this Court, pursuant to Rule 18, Ala. R.App. P., the following question: “In Alabama, is a ‘default’ judgment premised upon discovery sanctions or other post-answer conduct of the defendant sufficient to support the application of issue preclusion in a later proceeding?”1 We answer this question in the negative.
Facts and Procedural History
In its certification to this Court, the BAP provided the following factual background:
“[Anthony A.] Malfatti[, the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 68,272 Gail Spilman v. Darryl M. HarleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Gober v. Terra + CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- In Re Norman Docteroff, Debtor, Bert L. Wolstein Lady Iris Corporation v. Norman DocteroffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ronald Sellers v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Rudy v. Walter Coke, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014
- New Falls Corporation v. SoniDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Payne v. BallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2024
- The Estates of Robert Moss and Brenda Moss by Dana v. DorandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2022