Legal Opinion

Long v. Long

California Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1941No. S. F. 15969PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

On January 7, 1930, the Superior Court of Santa Clara County awarded appellant Margaret C. Long an interlocutory decree of divorce against respondent Louis A. Long directing him to pay appellant $50 a month alimony for the six months from February 5, 1930, to and including July 5, 1930. This alimony was duly paid. The final decree of divorce, entered on March 30, 1931, neither awarded alimony to appellant nor reserved to the court jurisdiction thereafter to make an allowance for appellant’s support. On November 10, 1931, on application of appellant supported by an affidavit averring that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tolle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Bechtel v. BechtelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hudson v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Monroe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Wilson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API