Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re McBurney Law Services, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 21, 2002No. 2001-159-M.P., 2000-11-M.PPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFlanders, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the Court’s opinion with respect to (1) the propriety of the valuation panel’s decision to vacate the stipulation, and (2) the date when interest should begin to accrue on the value of the withdrawing attorney’s stock ownership. I would deny certiorari and affirm the panel’s decision in all respects (except for its assertion that it made no findings, determinations, or conclusions that affect other pending litigation between the parties). I would do so because I believe that the panel possessed the authority to vacate the parties’ stipulation concerning Kevin…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. T I Federal Credit Union v. DelBonisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Matter of Falstaff Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  3. Skaling v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  4. Paola v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  5. D'Ambra v. North Providence School CommitteeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API