Legal Opinion
Chief Pomaj-Chakmam-Yajalaji v. Miguel Sague, Jr., et al.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 29, 2026No. 2:26-cv-01091Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHIEF POMAJ-CHAKMAM-YAJALAJI, 2:26-CV-01091-CCW Plaintiff, v. MIGUEL SAGUE, JR, et al. Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Pro se Plaintiff Chief Pomaj-Chakmam-Yajalaji is proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. For the reasons that follow, the Court will DISMISS the Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failing to state a claim against Defendants pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). I. Background On July 27, 2026, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 5. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.