Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Landsdale

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Eighth District, Humboldt County. The defendant appealed. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action of ejectment. The defendant admits, in his answer, that he is in possession, but denies that his possession is unlawful or wrongful. He does not deny the plaintiff’s title, but alleges that he holds the legal title in trust for him, and asks that such be the judgment of the Court, and that the plaintiff be made to convey it to him. To this equitable defense the plaintiff demurred. The Court below sustained the demurrer, and ordered what it termed the cross-complaint to be dismissed. No further trial was had and no further order or judgment made, except an order-staying…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moulton v. EllmakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rickert v. ZoegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Rickert v. ZoegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Rickert v. ZoegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API