Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 14, 2016No. AC36185PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

Upon a grant of certification to appeal, the respondent, the Commissioner of Correction, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court granting in part the amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the petitioner, Carvaughn Johnson. The respondent claims that the court improperly concluded that the petitioner proved a violation of his right to a fair trial because he did not receive effective assistance from his trial counsel. We agree with the respondent and, accordingly, reverse in part the judgment of the habeas court.

The following procedural history underlies this appeal.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Charles v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  2. Abdus-Sabur v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  3. Balbuena v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
  4. Carvaughn Johnson v. Angel Quiros, Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of CorrectionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
  5. Johnson v. QuirosDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API