Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex Parte Lingenfelter

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1911No. 1267Published

From McClennan County. Original habeas corpus proceeding, asking release from a commitment issued out of the Corporation Court of the city of Waco, on a conviction of violating the Sunday law, assessing a fine of $20. The opinion states the case.

1Dissent

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge,

(dissenting.)—The questions of fact, and the questions of law dependent upon the facts, are carefully and accurately stated in applicant’s brief, and the authorities are cited in support of the propositions relied upon for the discharge from custody of applicant. The brief and argument concisely and ably present the legal questions involved, and in my judgment, the propositions relied upon are correct and sustained by the authorities and the law. I, therefore, adopt the brief of counsel as my dissenting opinion, which is as follows:

“The applicant, William…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Evans v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Block v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Hermance v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Constant v. . University of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Ex Parte RoquemoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API