Legal Opinion
Lane McGath v. Auto-Body North Shore, Incorporated, Louis J. Babbini and Anna M. Babbini
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 19, 1993No. 92-2728PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
Lane McGath alleged that amendments made to his employer’s pension plan violated Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) § 510, 29 U.S.C. § 1140, and were made in violation of his employer’s fiduciary duties. A magistrate judge granted summary judgment to the defendants. Mr. McGath appeals from that judgment, and we affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
A. Facts
Louis and Anna Mae Babbini own and operate Auto Body North Shore, Inc. On July 18, 1983, Lane McGath was hired by Auto Body. Auto Body maintained an ERISA-qualified pension plan for its eligible employees. The Babbinis were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Joseph E. Dister v. The Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Gavalik v. Continental Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Edmond C. Teumer v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- John H. Johnson v. Georgia-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- James E. Stiltner v. Beretta U.S.A. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Andersen v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.