Legal Opinion

Zeringue v. Blouin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1966No. 6774PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOTTINGER, Judge.

The appellants instituted this possessory action claiming that they were the heirs of Charles Zeringue and his wife, and, as such, were the owners in indivisión of all of fractional Section 110, Township 15 South, Range 18 East, Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. In their petition they asserted that certain oil, gas and mineral leases granted by the appellees were constituting a continuous slander of their title and a disturbance in law of their title. In their petition, appellants'prayed that the appellees be ordered to “assert their adverse claims of ownership of said property”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leader Realty Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. Smith v. Southern Kraft CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
  3. Tremont Lumber Co. v. Powers & Critchett Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  4. Feazel v. PeekSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  5. Sessions v. Tensas River Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plaisance v. CollinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Armstrong v. ArmstrongLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Johnson v. La Bokay CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Zeringue v. BlouinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API