Legal Opinion

Trustees of New Pulaski Cemetery v. Ballentine

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

This appeal involves the validity of chapter 244, Private Acts of 1923, which provides:

“That in counties having a population of not more than thirty-one thousand nor less than thirty thousand nine hundred, according to the federal census of 1920, or any subsequent federal census, cemeteries incorporated under the laws of this State for the public good, and not for private gain, shall have the right of eminent domain for the purpose of making needed extensions or additions, said right to he exercised under provisions of general law.”

The act is limited in its scope, under the population…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Myar v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  3. State Highway Department v. Montgomery Mitchell's HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Smiddy v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Memphis State Line Railroad v. Forest Hill Cemetery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erwin Billard Parlor v. BucknerTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. COUNTY HIGHWAY COM'N OF RUTHERFORD CTY. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  3. Sterchi Bros. Stores, Inc. v. WallaceTennessee Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API