Legal Opinion

Reed v. Thompson

New York City Family Court

Decided May 7, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph T. Pilato, J.

The Department of Social Services brought a petition alleging that the ex-wife of their recipient is responsible for his support. There is no allegation that he was a recipient or in need of assistance at the time respondent divorced him. The divorce was granted on a fault ground and provided no support for the defendant (husband).

The statutes creating a responsibility of a spouse to support his espoused (Family Ct. Act, § 413; Social Services Law, § 101, subd. 1) are penal in nature and must be strictly construed. (Matter of West v. Charles, 46 Misc 2d 200; Matter of Lasher v. Decker, 43…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lasher v. DeckerNew York City Family Court · 1964
  2. West v. CharlesNew York City Family Court · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russo v. RizzoNew York Family Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API