Legal Opinion

Pillsbury Co. v. Huenefeld

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided October 19, 1981No. Civ. A. 79-0933Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAUMAN S. SCOTT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, the Pillsbury Company (Pillsbury) filed suit on July 11,1979, to foreclose on a collateral mortgage that was executed by defendant Fred Huenefeld, Jr. (Huenefeld), to secure his obligation under a continuing guaranty agreement. That agreement was entered into for the purpose of ensuring the performance of Riverport Terminal, Inc. (Riverport), a now defunct grain storage facility, in its obligation to purchase and store soybeans for Pillsbury in return for the latter’s inventory financing.

Harry R. Henderson (Henderson), one of the other…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Jones-JournetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. Succession of CancienneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Louisiana Bank and Trust Co., Crowley v. BoutteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  4. American B. & T. Co. v. Blue Bird Restaurant & L., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  5. Brock v. First State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API