Legal Opinion

State v. Rangel

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 5, 1970No. 1 CA-CR 205PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUCKER, Judge.

Defendant, Ramon Rangel, was informed •against for the possession of heroin. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered a judgment of guilty. Defendant was sentenced to not less than fifteen nor more twenty years. He now appeals that judgment.

Several issues are presented for review:(1) Was the search warrant legally sufficient and the heroin found thereunder properly admitted into evidence ?(2) Can officers enter a dwelling by warrant without announcement?(3) Was certification by the Secretary of the Prison sufficient to support evidence of a prior conviction?(4) Can a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. Bock Leung ChewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. State v. WatlingArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. Court of Appeals, Division IArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. State v. GreenleafCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. SEARCH WARRANTS C-419847 & C-419848 v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Prichard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  4. State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API