State v. Rangel
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Judge.
Defendant, Ramon Rangel, was informed •against for the possession of heroin. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered a judgment of guilty. Defendant was sentenced to not less than fifteen nor more twenty years. He now appeals that judgment.
Several issues are presented for review:(1) Was the search warrant legally sufficient and the heroin found thereunder properly admitted into evidence ?(2) Can officers enter a dwelling by warrant without announcement?(3) Was certification by the Secretary of the Prison sufficient to support evidence of a prior conviction?(4) Can a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. Bock Leung ChewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- State v. WatlingArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. Court of Appeals, Division IArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- State v. GreenleafCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- SEARCH WARRANTS C-419847 & C-419848 v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Prichard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- State v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972