Legal Opinion
Alpha Beta Acme Markets, Inc. v. City of Whittier
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 7, 1968No. Civ. 31161PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
This is an appeal from an order of dismissal under Code of Civil Procedure section 581, subdivision 3 as to defendants City of Whittier and Whittier Uptown Parking District No. 2. The order of dismissal was based upon sustaining of demurrers to each of plaintiff’s six causes of action as set forth in its first amended complaint upon representation of counsel for plaintiff that no facts could be added if leave to amend were granted.
On February 26, 1963, the City of Whittier adopted Ordinance No. 1598, which is “The Whittier Improvement Procedure Code. ’ ’ Ordinance No. 1598 is entitled as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rich v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Brill v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Estate of JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Fahey v. City Council of City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- McDonald v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by9 opinions
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- County of Santa Barbara v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Community Development Commission v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- City of Whittier v. AramianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- State v. DaviesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.