Legal Opinion

Randolph W. Wilkins v. Office of the Missouri Attorney General and Chris Koster

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 2015No. ED101493PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPatricia L. Cohen, Presiding Judge

Introduction

Randolph Wilkins (Plaintiff) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of the Office of the Missouri Attorney General (OMAG) on his claim that the OMAG discriminated against him on the basis of age and disability in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). Plaintiff asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the OMAG’s motion for a protective order and to quash the trial subpoena served on Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

In January 2006, Plaintiff, then age 57 and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rafael Lozano v. BNSF Railway CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  2. State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. MessinaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  3. Coyle v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Franklin v. FriedrichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. State Ex Rel. R. W. Filkey, Inc. v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Newell Machinery Co., Inc. v. Pro Circuit, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API