Randolph W. Wilkins v. Office of the Missouri Attorney General and Chris Koster
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPatricia L. Cohen, Presiding Judge
Introduction
Randolph Wilkins (Plaintiff) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis in favor of the Office of the Missouri Attorney General (OMAG) on his claim that the OMAG discriminated against him on the basis of age and disability in violation of the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). Plaintiff asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the OMAG’s motion for a protective order and to quash the trial subpoena served on Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
In January 2006, Plaintiff, then age 57 and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rafael Lozano v. BNSF Railway CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Ford Motor Co. v. MessinaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Coyle v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Franklin v. FriedrichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- State Ex Rel. R. W. Filkey, Inc. v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Newell Machinery Co., Inc. v. Pro Circuit, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2020