Legal Opinion
Handler v. 1050 Tenants Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 25, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin Diamond, J.), entered August 14, 2001 and October 2, 2001, which, inter alia, denied the motion of the Lapidus defendants for a change of venue and granted the motion of plaintiff Arthur M. Handler to preliminarily enjoin defendants Steven Lapidus and Iris Lapidus from operating the two water-cooled air conditioning units in their apartment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff, an attorney, resides in an apartment immediately below the Lapidus defendants, also attorneys, at 1050 Park Avenue, a cooperative building owned by 1050…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Doe v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- 1050 Tenants Corp. v. LapidusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Krupka v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Rothwax v. Spice-handlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cohen v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Gossel v. Beazer East, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2006
- Maurer v. MaurerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Maurer v. MaurerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012