Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Page

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 2, 1964No. 5221PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

By its policy of insurance, styled a “Crusader” policy, the plaintiff undertook to pay “all damages which the insured shall be legally obligated to pay because of . . . injury to or destruction of property, arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use ... of the owned automobile,” a 1958 Lincoln convertible. The policy provided that it insured, in addition to the named insured and any resident of his household: “Any other person with respect to the owned automobile, provided the actual use thereof is with the permission of the named insured.”

The depositions upon which the findings and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Grieger, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Dickinson v. Great American Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Hall v. Illinois National InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  4. Kadrmas Ex Rel. Kadrmas v. MudnaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Evans-Reid v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Peerless Insurance v. VigueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  3. Government Employees Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Sutton Mutual Insurance v. O'BrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  5. Peerless Insurance v. VigueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API