Onstatt v. Crain

Appellant sued appellee in justice court on a note for $135, with a credit of $80.41; said note being given in payment of certain farming implements, and the credit given on account of return of planter.

Appellee, Crain, set up a cross-action, claiming that in fall of 1923 he -and appellant, Onstatt, formed a partnership to carry on- a cotton business, and that, when they had their settlement, they did not take into consideration $217.35 which had been used out of profits to pay a note of that amount made by appellant Onstatt to Shear Company, wherefore he was entitled to judgment for half of…