Legal Opinion
Rae v. Bay Area Rapid Transit Supervisory & Professional Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 30, 1980No. Civ. 46175PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTT, J.
At issue here is the validity of the agency shop provisions of a collective bargaining agreement between San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) and Bay Area Rapid Transit Supervisory and Professional Association (BARTSPA). Appellants are nonunion supervisory personnel of BART who sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the agency shop provision of the BARTSPA contract which requires that employees who are not BARTSPA members shall, as a condition of employment, pay BARTSPA an amount equal to its initial administration fee and its regular membership dues.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Andrew Jergens Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Krusi v. Bear, Stearns & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Fort Wayne Educ. Ass'n, Inc. v. GoetzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Schaffer v. Board of Education of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Amalgamated Transit Union v. San Joaqu (In re in Reg'l Transit Dist.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.