Legal Opinion

Karen M. Tabora v. Daniel Boyd, et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 22, 2025No. 4:25-cv-00250Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KAREN M. TABORA, Case No. 4:25-cv-00250-KAW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO 9 v. AMEND 10 DANIEL BOYD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 11 Defendants. 12 13 On July 29, 2025, Defendants Daniel Boyd, Rony Flores, Prince Nagi, and Uriel Vazquez 14 filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. (Defs.’ Mot., Dkt. No. 22.) 15 Upon review of the moving papers, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution 16 without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), and, for the reasons…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API