State ex rel. City of Duluth v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for St. Louis county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Cant, J.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Proceedings instituted by the city of Duluth to compel appellant, the Northern Pacific Railway Company, to repair and thereafter maintain in suitable condition for public use a viaduct now existing over , its tracks at Lake avenue in that city. Judgment was ordered and entered against the company, awarding the relief demanded, from which it appealed.
1. The material facts, so far as the obligation of appellant to keep and maintaih the viaduct in repair is concerned, are substantially like those presented in the case of State v. St. Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co., supra, page 380, 108 N. W. 261. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska Ex Rel. OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- American Tobacco Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- City of Superior v. RoemerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- State ex rel. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.