Legal Opinion

Crocker v. Synpol, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 18, 1987No. 09 86 232 CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Appeal from the granting of a joint Motion for Summary Judgment. The trial court granted Dr. Houston G. Hamby’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Synpol, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

The background of the dispute arises out of the termination of Mark Crocker’s employment with Synpol, Inc. After certain meetings between Crocker, his union, and Synpol, Crocker requested and was allowed to resign his employment.

Before he resigned from his employment, the Appellant was confronted with some laboratory tests by way of urinalysis. These laboratory results purportedly…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Biddle v. Warren General HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Biddle v. Warren Gen. Hosp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Gulf States Utilities Co. v. McMillonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1988
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API