Legal Opinion
People v. Rothschild
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 1974PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGabrielli, J.
The novel and primary question on this appeal concerns the propriety of inquiring of the defendant police' officer upon cross-examination whether, either prior or after his arrest, he had revealed to his superiors or anyone that, as claimed by the defendant, the complaining witness was attempting to bribe him. We hold that this inquiry was proper.
The defendant stands convicted of grand larceny, first degree and attempted grand larceny, both by extortion (Penal Law, §§ 155.40, 110.00)1 and the convictions have been affirmed (41 A D 2d 1028).
On October 21, 1969, defendant and other Narcotics…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. MleczkoNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Raymond R. Fowle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- People v. RutiglianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- People v. DawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. ConyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. De GeorgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. McGrathNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. ConyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.