Legal Opinion

Scott v. Sprint PCS

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 20, 2012No. 109275. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNETH L. BUETTNER,

Presiding Judge.

T 1 Petitioner Horace Seott seeks review of an order by a three-judge panel of the Workers' Compensation Court which affirmed and modified the trial court's order. We sustain.

" 2 Seott filed his Form 3 June 17, 2010, in which he alleged cumulative trauma injuries to the neck and hands caused by continuous and repetitive use of a keyboard and monitor. Seott asserted January 31, 2009 was the last date of exposure. In its Form 10, Employer denied Scott sustained an injury in the course and scope of employment, and denied Seott timely notified Employer about…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. v. BonatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Auto Plus of WoodwardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Travis v. Mays Housecall Home Health, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. ATWOOD DISTRIBUTING LP v. CAMPCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. WELDON v. FLEX-N-GATE, OKLAHOMA, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  5. ATWOOD DISTRIBUTING LP v. CAMPCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API