Legal Opinion
Hubler v. Dayton City
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 26, 1938No. 1488PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*680OPINION
By HORNBECK, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment against the plaintiff for costs after the sustaining ol a general demurrer to the second amended petition.
The action was for damages for injuries claimed to have been sustained by the plaintiff when she stepped into a broken tile as she was walking across the treelawn in front of Lot No 1827, Malvern Avenue, Dayton, Ohio.
The second amended' petition, avers, insofar as pertinent to our inquiry, that between the sidewalk and the curb of Malvern Avenue there is and was a narrow strip of ground used as a lawn or parkway,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Terry v. . Village of PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Martin v. City of CantonOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- Deal v. Garaux Bros. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1930
- Guthrie v. Columbus cityOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- Zupancic v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Richter v. Columbus CityOhio Court of Appeals · 1952
- Supensky v. Oakwood, Unpublished Decision (6-10-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Liberman v. AkronSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1959