Legal Opinion

Supensky v. Oakwood, Unpublished Decision (6-10-2005)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 2005No. 20812UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} This case is before us on the appeal of Ashley, June, and Robert Supensky from a trial court decision granting summary judgment to the City of Oakwood (Oakwood). In support of the appeal, the Supenskys claim in a single assignment of error that "[t]he trial court committed reversible error by granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Oakwood by finding the City of Oakwood was immune to all Appellant's claims pursuant to Ohio Revised Code 2744.10, et. seq."

{¶ 2} After reviewing the facts and applicable law, we find the assignment of error without merit. Accordingly, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Colbert v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Manufacturer's National Bank v. Erie County Road CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Harp v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Harp v. Cleveland Hts.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Leffel v. CasstownOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API