Legal Opinion
Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Hunefeld
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 1964No. Civ. 10738PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
Plaintiff, “Underwriters,” sought and obtained a declaratory judgment holding their indemnity insurance policy issued to defendants, owners of a drag racing strip, did not, because of exclusions set forth, cover a certain accident causing bodily injuries to one Phillip Gregg.
The policy excludes indemnity for owners’ liability for bodily injuries to participants, racing officials, pitmen, mechanics and certain others, but this exclusion does not apply when such persons are “outside of the racing arena proper and . . . not participating in the actual racing operations in the capacities…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Oakland Stadium v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3Cited by9 opinions
- Valdez v. Interinsurance Exch. of Auto. Club of S. Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Dart Transportation Service v. MacK Trucks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Pacific Indem. Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. v. Northeastern New Mexico Fair Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- O'DOAN v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.