Legal Opinion

General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Ramos

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

Darwin W. Telesford, Acting Justice.

Petitioner insurance company moves to vacate a subpoena duces tecum requiring the production of all insurance policies relating to an automobile involved in a negligence action now on trial. There are six defendants. One admits that he is the registered owner, another that he was the operator of the car at the time of the accident. The remaining four defendants deny ownership and control of the automobile.

Generally, it is considered highly prejudicial to inject into a negligence action evidence that defendant was insured (Simpson v. Foundation Co., 201 N.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simpson v. . Foundation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Di Tommaso v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. Di Tommaso v. . Syracuse UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. In re the Estate of EbbetsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  5. Hummel v. L. S. Fischl's Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API