Legal Opinion

Best Foods, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 23, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

The complaint includes in its allegations: “XVI. That the leakage and loss of said peanut oil was caused either by a defect in the construction of or the defective condition of said tank car at the time that it was loaded with said peanut oil by or in behalf of the defendant, Mitsubishi, or by the wrongful, negligent and careless handling thereof by the defendant, Great Northern Railway Company, or by the wrongful, negligent and careless handling thereof by the defendant, Southern Pacific Company, or by a combination of said causes.”

The plaintiff seeks to recover in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Torrence v. SheddSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Starin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. IdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Fraser v. JennisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Chi., RI & Pac. Ry. v. DowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Best Foods, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1928
  2. Gray v. Stanford Research InstituteDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API