Legal Opinion

Gray v. Stanford Research Institute

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided October 14, 1952No. Civ. A. 1331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff Gray and several other land owners, all citizens of Texas, as plaintiffs in a State Court, each suing on a separate claim, neither having any undivided, joint or common interest in any other claim or claims, but joining simply for economy and convenience in the same suit, since all claims had a common origin, brought this action originally against the Stanford Research Institute, a California corporation, and American Republics Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and later by amendment also against the partnership named Slick-Moorman Oil Company, all the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Snow v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  4. Plymouth Gold Mining Co. v. Amador & Sacramento Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Keiser v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lancer Industries, Inc. v. American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
  2. Gray v. Stanford Research InstituteDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API