Nindle v. State Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district, court for Douglas county, where the cause had been brought from the county court, and its judgment affirmed by Savage, J. Parol evidence should have been admitted to explain the intention of the parties, and the court erred in excluding that offered.
Read the full summary
Error to the district, court for Douglas county, where the cause had been brought from the county court, and its judgment affirmed by Savage, J. Parol evidence should have been admitted to explain the intention of the parties, and the court erred in excluding that offered. Leggit v. Buckhalter, 30 Miss., 421. 2 Leading Cases in Equity, Hare & "Wallace Notes, 670. Boggs v. Taylor, 26 Ohio State, 604. Painter v. Painter, 18 Ohio, 265. Alger v. Kennedy, 49 Vermont, 109. Goddard v. Bulon, 9 American Decisions, 663.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
The defendant brought an action of forcible. detainer against the plaintiffs in error in the county court of Douglas county, where judgment was rendered in its favor, which was affirmed in the district court. This is a proceeding in error to reverse that judgment. ■
To maintain the action in the county court the defendant introduced in evidence a lease, of which the following is a copy of all that is material in this case:
*246“This lease made and entered into this sixth day of December, 1881, by and between the State Bank of Nebraska, a corporation doing business at Omaha, Nebraska, of the first…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Goodrich v. McClaryNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by7 opinions
- Novelty Hat Manufacturing Co. v. WisebergSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- San Antonio Life, Ins. Co. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Gerner v. ChurchNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Sarratt v. ArthurSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- McCreary v. ActonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.