Legal Opinion

McCreary v. Acton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1922No. 13567PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The chief question to be determined is whether or not the last sentence of the letter — Exhibit A of the petition — is ambiguous. That sentence is as follows: “The terms mentioned by you of closing the matter January 1st will be acceptable.” When is a written contract ambiguous? In Novelty Hat Mfg. Co. v. Wiseberg, 126 Ga. 800 (55 S. E. 923), Mr. Justice Beck said (p. 801) : “Many definitions of the term ‘ ambiguous ’ can be found in the reports, in law dictionaries, and in the various standard lexicons, and *165while these definitions vary among themselves,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forsyth Manufacturing Co. v. CastlenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Novelty Hat Manufacturing Co. v. WisebergSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Johnston v. PattersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. McMahan v. TysonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  5. McCommons v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burroughs Corp. v. Macon Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API