In re City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Horace F. Hutchinson from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 30th day of January, 1903, continuing the report of commissioners of estimate and assessment in the above-entitled proceeding.
1Opinion of the Court
Woodward, J.:
In 1899 the Legislature of this State, by chapter 257 of the Laws of that year, entitled “An act in relation to Clinton avenue, in the borough of Brooklyn, in the city of New York,”'enacted that “the boundaries of Clinton avenue in the borough of Brooklyn and city of New York are hereby so changed that between Gates avenue and Willoughby avenue the easterly side, or line of. said Clinton avenue shall be twenty feet east of its present easterly side or line, and its westerly side or line shall be twenty feet west of its present westerly side or line. The two strips of land.hereby…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Donovan v. City of OswegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Bismarck v. CaseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930