Miner v. Detroit Post & Tribune Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Superior Court of Detroit. Case for libel. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
The plaintiff is, and was in June, 1881, police justice of the city of Detroit. The defendant is publisher of a daily newspaper in that city. June 23, 1881, defendant published in its paper, concerning the plaintiff, the following article:
“more oe miner.
A few days since a complaint was made before-Justice Miner against a Chinaman. Without the assent of the complainant, Miner inserted the name of a second Chinaman, against whom no complaint was made and whom no one charged with being connected with the offense.
At the examination afterwards held, Miner admitted that he inserted the second name…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Harlan E. Orr v. The Argus-Press CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Rouch v. Enquirer & News of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Ponder v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Schultz v. Reader's Digest Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979
- Bowerman v. Detroit Free PressMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.