Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sheridan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1913No. Docket No. 17Published

Error to Emmet; Shepherd, J. Assumpsit by Sarah J. Smith against Thomas J. Sheridan and Nicholas B. Crevling, copartners as the Harbor Springs Woodenware Company, for money had and received. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought against the defendants as copartners composing the firm of the Harbor Springs Woodenware Company. The declaration consisted of a special count, and the common counts in assumpsit; the special count alleging that the defendants, on the 3d day of March, 1908, borrowed from the plaintiff $1,050, in consideration of which defendants did, at the date aforesaid, make and execute in the name of the said firm a certain agreement in writing, as follows:

“Harbor Springs, Michigan, March 3, 1908.
“Due Mrs. S. J. Smith, one thousand and fifty ($1,050) dollars, with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Calkins v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hubbardston Lumber Co. v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Childs v. PellettMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Durgin v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API