Stoddard v. Fiske
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
In an action brought by the plaintiffs, husband and wife, against the defendants for damages for personal injuries suffered by the wife, they recovered judgment against the defendant Fiske, but as to defendant Nixon judgment was rendered in his favor and against the plaintiffs. From that part of the judgment in favor of Nixon and against themselves the plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.
The facts of the case are substantially these: Some time in the month of September, 1913, three gentlemen, two of whom were Fiske and Nixon, the' defendants in this action, were standing in front of the St.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Brady v. Chicago & G. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Messmer v. Bell & Coggeshall Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Smith v. BelshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Atwood v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Edwards v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Flores v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Newman v. SteuernagelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Thompson v. KecklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Cope v. GobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.