Legal Opinion
Stuart Rudnick, Inc. v. Jewelers Protection Services, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 3, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered December 4, 1990, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed, without costs. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiff’s complaint.
When a party has entered into a contract absolving it from its own negligence, public policy requires that it may still be held liable for damages caused by its gross negligence (Hanover Ins. Co. v D & W Cent. Sta. Alarm Co., 164 AD2d…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Colnaghi, U.S.A., Ltd. v. Jewelers Protection Services, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hanover Insurance v. D & W Central Station Alarm Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wheelock v. Sport Kites, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1993
- Industrial Risk Insurers v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn. v. LOSCO GROUPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Budd Morgan Central Station Alarm Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Consumers Distributing Co. v. Baker Protective Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.