Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Budd Morgan Central Station Alarm Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 5, 2000No. CV 98-7560PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEXLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”) commenced this diversity action, as subrogee to the rights of Kenneth and Abby Kenigsberg, against defendant Budd Morgan Central Station Alarm Company, Inc.(“Budd Morgan”). Budd Morgan moves for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
I. The Alarm Company and the Contract
Budd Morgan is a corporation that designs, manufactures, sells, installs, and monitors fire…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- William J. McLEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Industrial Risk Insurers v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- American Automobile Insurance v. Rest Assured Alarm System, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Corbett v. FIRSTLINE SECURITY, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Dassero v. EdwardsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2002
- Sidik v. Royal Sovereign Int'l Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.