Legal Opinion

Ridgeland School District v. Biesmann

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1946No. File No. 8774PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENSON, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by the appellant school district and its officers under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, to determine the validity of a large number of the district’s warrants, which it contends are void because issued for obligations incurred after the constitutional debt limit had been reached. The suit was dismissed as to defendant Corson County and separate judgments were entered in favor of Timber Lake School District No. 2 and George Biesmann. Plaintiff appeals from the Biesmann judgment alone.

Appellant Ridgeland School District No. 14 was formed in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. In re State WarrantsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State ex rel. Barton v. HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Williamson v. AldrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  5. McCavick v. Independent School Dist.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farrar v. Britton Independent School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  2. School Dist. No. 74 of Hall Co. v. School Dist. of Gr. Is.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API