Legal Opinion

In re State Warrants

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1895PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Advisory opinion of the judges of the supreme court as to the legality of an act of the legislature to provide for the issue of warrants by the state to defray current expenses, based on revenues assessed and not yet collected.

Supreme Court Chambers.

Pierre, S. D., February 8, 1895.

To His Excellency, Charles H. Sheldon, Governor:

We have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your communication of this date, accompanied by a copy of an act, with amendment thereto, which has just passed the legislature, entitled “An act to provide for the issue of warrants by the state of South Dakota, to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. People ex rel. McCullough v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. State ex rel. Ash v. ParkinsonNevada Supreme Court · 1869
  4. In re Limitation of TaxationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. LiverightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Baker v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Bryan v. MenefeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Brown v. Gay-Padgett Hdw. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. McFarland v. BarronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API